The Work Applied AI Engineering · Automation · Systems Refresher

Career
Engine

A vague idea sitting in a manual spreadsheet became the excuse to get hands-on again — touring Claude Code, Gemini Antigravity, Codex, GitHub, Supabase, and standard deployment practice until "designer" stopped being the whole job title.

Disciplines Agentic Automation · Systems Design · Dashboard UX
Tools Claude Code · Gemini Antigravity · Codex · Supabase
Output Automated Intake · Reference Database · Live Dashboard
Status Live · Solo Project

For a long stretch, my hands-on relationship with code, infrastructure, and deployment had gone quiet. Design work doesn't always demand it, and the tooling moves fast enough that "it's been a while" turns into a real gap if you let it sit. I needed a project low-stakes enough to experiment recklessly with and repetitive enough to actually build muscle memory — and I already had one running in the background: my own job search, tracked, at that point, in a spreadsheet with no ambition beyond staying organized.

So I turned it into a tour of the current toolchain. I built the core of the system in Claude Code, then rebuilt pieces of it in Gemini Antigravity and Codex just to see how differently each agent reasoned through the same brief. I dusted off Git and GitHub — branching, committing, pushing to a real remote — until it stopped feeling like a refresher and started feeling like fluency again. I stood up a Supabase project to relearn what an actual data layer looks like next to a spreadsheet. And I walked the full deployment path more than once: build, environment config, continuous deploy, a live URL at the end of it.

One small, satisfying discovery came out of the data along the way — cross-referencing stale "No Response" applications turned up a handful of listings that had likely been ghosted from the start, roles quietly filled while the posting stayed live. Useful, but a footnote next to the bigger shift underway: by the time the system was live, I wasn't just the designer describing what I wanted built. I was the one orchestrating the agents, shaping the data model, and shipping the deploy.

Agentic Automation Claude Code Gemini Antigravity Codex GitHub Workflows Supabase Deployment Practice Dashboard UX
View Live Site
Dashboard Overview
210Applications
14Interviews
92Rejections
107No Response
7%Interview Rate
131Days Active
Status Breakdown
Interview / Active9
Rejected92
No Response107
Application Status Mix
Interview / Active9
Rejected92
No Response107
Screening2
Weekly Cadence · Illustrative
The Data Underneath
210 Applications tracked automatically, zero manual entry
3 AI coding agents used to build and rebuild the same system
131 Days the automated intake ran unattended, start to offer
1 Signed offer at Google — the job search this system tracked

By the time this shipped, I wasn't describing the build to an engineer anymore. I was the one running it.

I built the core of the system in Claude Code first — an agent orchestrating an agent, effectively, since the whole point was relearning how to direct a build rather than just critique one. Once the shape of it worked, I rebuilt pieces of it in Gemini Antigravity and separately in Codex, less to compare output quality and more to see how differently each one reasoned through the same brief: what it asked before writing code, where it made assumptions, how it handled a spec that was intentionally a little vague.

In parallel, I forced myself through the fundamentals I'd let go rusty. Git and GitHub stopped being something I gestured at and became something I actually did — branching, committing, resolving my own merge conflicts, pushing to a real remote. I stood up a Supabase project specifically to relearn what a real data layer looks like: schemas, queries, relationships, instead of a spreadsheet pretending to be a database. And I walked the deployment path end to end more than once — build step, environment configuration, continuous deploy — until "ship it" stopped being a phrase I said to other people and became something I did myself.

AI Coding Agents
Claude Code — core build Gemini Antigravity — rebuild & compare Codex — rebuild & compare
Systems Refresher
Version Control Git / GitHub Branching + PRs
Data Layer Supabase Schemas + Queries
Deploy Netlify Continuous Deploy
Build Depth by Agent
Claude Code — Core BuildPrimary build
Gemini Antigravity — Rebuild & ComparePartial rebuild
Codex — Rebuild & ComparePartial rebuild

The job-search data underneath all of it was real, not a toy dataset, which made every decision have actual stakes: a scheduled intake agent scans Gmail on a daily and weekly cadence, classifies each thread, and reconciles it against a structured reference database — one queryable record of every application instead of forty open tabs. That same database is a small, satisfying discovery generator on the side, most notably flagging listings that had likely gone stale or been quietly filled while still posted.

Twenty years of product thinking, it turns out, comes with more range than I'd been using — orchestrator, engineer, strategist, not just the designer describing what should get built. The job search ended in a signed offer at Google, which was the smaller win.

Ghost Listing Flag
FLAGGED No response 45+ days, cross-referenced against reposted requisition IDs — a small side-discovery, not the headline.
The Funnel 210 → 14 → 1 Applications → Interviews → Offer
From Designer To
Orchestrator Engineer Strategist

The main thing was never the job search. It was taking a vague idea out of a manual spreadsheet and proving I could still build.